Calculate spot size at the real inspection distance before buying.
Data-based buying guide
Best thermal cameras for solar inspection
Solar work is distance-sensitive: enough native detector resolution and a low IFOV are needed to isolate cells and connectors.
Radiometric capture and reporting support repeatable panel surveys.
Frame rate, ergonomics and optional telephoto lenses affect field productivity.
Selector results for a typical situation
Typical situation: a faulty cell on a panel, a 15 cm area whose temperature is measured, at 5 m. Only current devices that are documented well enough and suited to this situation are kept. They are ranked separately by level of use, each level having its own scoring scale: a score is only comparable within the same group. Suitability combines the use-case score (60 %) and spatial resolution at this distance (40 %). 49 other devices could not be assessed because essential data is missing (most often: spatial resolution cannot be calculated (field of view not published)). Adjust distance, target, budget or form factor in the selector.
Occasional use
Phone modules, thermal phones and entry-level cameras
Compact devices or devices tethered to a smartphone, for occasional checks.
| Camera | Suitability | Use-case score | Native resolution | NETD | Price | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIKMICRO Mini3#1 | 93 % | 8890 % confidence | 384 × 288 | 35 mK | €€€ | Requires a compatible smartphone (connector, app). |
| InfiRay T3 Pro#2 | 84 % | ≈7363 % confidence | 384 × 288 | 60 mK | €€€ | Requires a compatible smartphone (connector, app). Not published: radiometric export. |
| InfiRay T3S#3 | 80 % | ≈6663 % confidence | 384 × 288 | 50 mK | €€€ | Requires a compatible smartphone (connector, app). Not published: radiometric export. |
| Seek Thermal CompactPRO#4 | 79 % | ≈6765 % confidence | 320 × 240 | 70 mK | €€ | 9 Hz frame rate: choppy image if the target or camera moves. Not published: measurement accuracy, radiometric export. |
| Thermal Master P3#5 | 74 % | ≈6866 % confidence | 256 × 192 | 35 mK | €€ | Requires a compatible smartphone (connector, app). Not published: radiometric export. |
Occasional use
Visual thermometers and compact imagers
Simple devices, often low resolution, for spotting a hot or cold point.
| Camera | Suitability | Use-case score | Native resolution | NETD | Price | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seek Thermal ShotPRO#1 | 73 % | 6986 % confidence | 320 × 240 | 70 mK | €€ | 9 Hz frame rate: choppy image if the target or camera moves. Not published: measurement accuracy. |
| Chauvin Arnoux C.A 1954 DiaCAm2#2 | 66 % | ≈6473 % confidence | 160 × 120 | not published | €€€€ | Partial score: only 73 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: NETD, measurement accuracy, frame rate. |
Regular use
General-purpose handheld cameras
Mid-range standalone cameras for frequent use.
| Camera | Suitability | Use-case score | Native resolution | NETD | Price | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLIR E52#1 | 83 % | 7588 % confidence | 240 × 180 | 50 mK | €€€€ | Beyond about 17 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. |
| Guide E2+#2 | 81 % | ≈7268 % confidence | 256 × 192 | 45 mK | €€€ | Partial score: only 68 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: radiometric export. |
| Guide E2#3 | 79 % | ≈6870 % confidence | 256 × 192 | 45 mK | €€€ | Partial score: only 70 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: radiometric export. |
| TOPDON TC005#4 | 74 % | 6794 % confidence | 256 × 192 | 40 mK | €€ | Beyond about 11 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. |
| FLIR C8#5 | 73 % | 6890 % confidence | 320 × 240 | 50 mK | €€€ | 8.7 Hz frame rate: choppy image if the target or camera moves. |
Professional use
Professional cameras
Full measurement settings, software and ruggedness for daily use.
| Camera | Suitability | Use-case score | Native resolution | NETD | Price | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLIR E76#1 | 87 % | 7888 % confidence | 320 × 240 | 30 mK | €€€€€ | Beyond about 23 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. |
| HIKMICRO M30#2 | 86 % | 7892 % confidence | 384 × 288 | 35 mK | €€€€ | Beyond about 18 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. |
| FLIR E54#3 | 85 % | 7689 % confidence | 320 × 240 | 40 mK | €€€€ | Beyond about 23 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. |
| UNI-T UTi165M#4 | 84 % | ≈7469 % confidence | 384 × 288 | 40 mK | €€ | Partial score: only 69 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: radiometric export. |
| HIKMICRO M31#5 | 83 % | ≈7773 % confidence | 384 × 288 | 30 mK | €€€€€ | Partial score: only 73 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: radiometric export. |
Expert use
Expert cameras
High resolution, interchangeable lenses or advanced features, for thermographers and industry.
| Camera | Suitability | Use-case score | Native resolution | NETD | Price | Watch out for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guide PT870S (25°, 50 Hz)#1 | 94 % | ≈9069 % confidence | 1280 × 1024 | 15 mK | not published | Partial score: only 69 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: price. |
| HIKMICRO SP120H (L25)#2 | 93 % | 8878 % confidence | 1280 × 1024 | 20 mK | not published | Beyond about 88 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. Not published: price. |
| FLIR T560#3 | 91 % | 8497 % confidence | 640 × 480 | 30 mK | €€€€€ | Beyond about 46 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. |
| Guide H6S#4 | 91 % | ≈8458 % confidence | 640 × 480 | 15 mK | €€€€€ | Partial score: only 58 % of the relevant specifications are published. Not published: radiometric export. |
| Sonel KT-670#5 | 90 % | 8478 % confidence | 640 × 480 | 30 mK | €€€€€ | Beyond about 45 m, the target becomes smaller than the measurable area: the temperature is no longer reliable and the device is excluded. Not published: frame rate, temperature range. |
What the camera needs to reveal on a solar installation
A solar panel turns part of the light into electricity and the rest into heat. When a cell no longer works properly (crack, degradation, shading, poor solder joint), it stops contributing and can even dissipate its neighbours’ energy: it becomes a hot spot. Thermography finds these anomalies panel by panel, without removing anything or shutting the installation down.
The most common targets are isolated hot cells, whole substrings running warmer (often linked to an active or failed bypass diode), disconnected panels that appear uniformly warmer than their neighbours, and hot connections in junction boxes, connectors and combiner boxes. Outdoor thermography of PV modules and plants is described in the technical specification IEC TS 62446-3.
Getting the measurement conditions right
- Measure while producing, under a clear sky with stable sunshine: a fault only heats up when the panel is producing. IEC TS 62446-3 notably recommends sufficient irradiance, commonly quoted as at least around 600 W/m². Passing clouds distort comparisons.
- Mind the viewing angle: the panel glass reflects the sky, the sun and the operator. Avoid aiming strictly perpendicular, which returns your own reflection, and very shallow angles, where reflection dominates. Change position to tell a reflection from a real hot spot.
- Compare panels with one another: they are identical and under the same sunshine. Comparison reveals the anomaly more than the absolute value does.
- Record the conditions: irradiance, ambient temperature, wind and time of day. They determine how severe a fault appears.
Distance, target size and resolution
The typical situation used by the selector is an area of about 15 cm seen from 5 m: a cell viewed from the ground or from the edge of a roof. A cell is usually 16 to 21 cm across, and half-cut cells are half as wide. For a defect to be located unambiguously, a cell must cover several pixels in each direction.
Example: with a 256 × 192 sensor and a 50° field of view (IFOV about 3.4 mrad), one pixel covers about 1.7 cm at 5 m. The measurable area with our five-pixel margin is about 8.5 cm, smaller than a cell. At 10 m that area grows to 17 cm: you can still spot a faulty panel, but no longer a specific cell. For inaccessible roofs and large plants, drone thermography changes the scale; that equipment has its own specialized ranking and the article thermal cameras for drones.
What matters, and what matters less
- Spatial resolution: the decisive criterion, because distance is often dictated by access. A 320 × 240 sensor or better, or a narrower field of view, is comfortable for inspecting from the ground.
- Temperature range: hot spots can exceed 100 °C on a panel in full sun; a range reaching at least 150 °C is prudent.
- Radiometric images and reporting: to document a warranty defect or monitor a fleet, images must be re-analysable and linked to the measurement conditions.
- Overlay with the visible image: it identifies the exact panel and rules out dirt, bird droppings or cast shadows.
- What matters less: very high sensitivity (faults usually produce differences of several degrees) and, for ground-level inspection, frame rate.
Common pitfalls
Reflection is the number one pitfall: a reflection of the sun or a warm cloud on the glass looks like a hot spot. A reflection moves when you move; a real defect stays attached to its cell. The second pitfall is shading and soiling: a chimney shadow or a bird dropping causes real but temporary heating, which is not a panel defect. The third is measuring through the glass while believing you measure the cell: the camera sees the glass surface, slightly cooler than the cell beneath. Values are therefore indications, and comparison between panels remains the safest method. Finally, an inspection on an overcast day may show no defects even though they exist.
Phone attachment or standalone camera?
For a homeowner checking their own accessible installation, a module with good resolution can be enough, but a phone screen is hard to read in full sun, which is exactly when you need to measure. For installers and maintenance teams, a standalone camera with a bright screen or viewfinder, visible overlay and reporting software is far better suited. Both formats are ranked separately above.
What budget should you plan?
To check a small accessible installation, the €€ to €€€ bands (€200 to €1,000) are suitable, provided you choose a native sensor of at least 256 × 192 and stay close to the panels. For installation or maintenance work, aim for €€€€ to €€€€€ (€1,000 and above): high resolution, reporting software and, if needed, a lens suited to longer distances. Large plants are better served by drone inspection. See the price ranges page.
Frequently asked questions
Can I inspect panels from the ground?
Yes, if the distance stays reasonable and the angle is favourable. Beyond about ten metres, or for a low-pitched roof seen from below, resolution and reflections become limiting, and a thermal drone takes over.
Does a hot spot always mean a faulty panel?
No. A shadow, dirt or a reflection produce similar images. Check that the anomaly persists, does not move with your viewpoint and is not caused by an external object.
Should I inspect at a particular time?
Preferably during hours of strong, stable sunshine, often around midday. Avoid early morning, evening and cloudy days, when production is too low or too variable.
What resolution do I need to see a cell?
It depends on the distance. The selector calculates, for your distance and cell size, whether a device can resolve them.