200 × 150 native thermal sensor,
NETD 100 mK, not published by the manufacturer Hz.
Number of the sensor's measurement points, shown to the catalog's scale.
The largest sensor in the database has 327 680 points.
Published by the manufacturer
Specifications
Values come from manufacturer documentation unless otherwise
noted in the sources at the bottom of the page. This device has not been physically tested.
Identity
Brand
Extech
Model
T200
Series
T
Commercial status
current
EAN code
not published by the manufacturer
Manufacturer reference
T200
Segment
S4
Sensor and image
Native resolution, width (px)
200
Native resolution, height (px)
150
Native detector pixels
30000
Displayed resolution, width (px)
not applicable
Displayed resolution, height (px)
not applicable
Interpolation method
none
Detector type
uncooled microbolometer
Detector material
not published by the manufacturer
Pixel pitch (µm)
not published by the manufacturer
Spectral band, min (µm)
7.5
Spectral band, max (µm)
13
NETD (mK)
100
NETD measurement conditions
100 mK @ 30 °C
Frame rate (Hz)
not published by the manufacturer
Optics
Horizontal field of view (°)
25
Vertical field of view (°)
19
Advertised IFOV (mrad)
2.18
Recalculated IFOV (mrad)
2.18
Minimum focus distance (m)
0.4
Focus
automatic
Interchangeable lenses
no
Digital zoom (×)
2
Macro lens
Availability
no
Reference
not applicable
Working distance (mm)
not applicable
Spot size (µm)
not applicable
Smallest measurable area (µm)
not applicable
Accuracy with macro (°C)
not applicable
Range max with macro (°C)
not applicable
Measurement
Range min (°C)
-20
Range max (°C)
1200
Absolute accuracy (°C)
2
Relative accuracy (%)
2
Emissivity setting
not published by the manufacturer
Reflected temperature correction
not published by the manufacturer
Measurement modes
not published by the manufacturer
Simultaneous cursors
not published by the manufacturer
Full radiometry
not published by the manufacturer
Visible channel
Visible camera (MP)
1.3
Image fusion
overlay
LED light
yes
Laser pointer
not published by the manufacturer
Ergonomics and ruggedness
Screen (inches)
3.5
Screen resolution
not published by the manufacturer
Touchscreen
yes
Weight (g)
not published by the manufacturer
Dimensions (mm)
not published by the manufacturer
IP rating
not published by the manufacturer
Drop resistance (m)
not published by the manufacturer
Operating temperature, min (°C)
not published by the manufacturer
Operating temperature, max (°C)
not published by the manufacturer
Power
Power type
built-in battery
Battery system
not applicable
Battery life (h)
not published by the manufacturer
Charging connector
not published by the manufacturer
Storage and connectivity
Internal memory (GB)
not published by the manufacturer
Memory card
not published by the manufacturer
Wi-Fi
not published by the manufacturer
Bluetooth
not published by the manufacturer
Wired interface
USB
File formats
not published by the manufacturer
Software
PC software
not published by the manufacturer
Free PC software
not published by the manufacturer
Mobile app
not applicable
Cloud service
not published by the manufacturer
Compliance
Calibration certificate provided
not published by the manufacturer
Declared standards
not published by the manufacturer
Warranty (months)
not published by the manufacturer
Support in France
not published by the manufacturer
Observations
IFOV OF 2.18 mrad ADVERTISED WITH THE 25° LENS, CONSISTENT WITH THE RECALCULATION from the 25° field of view and the sensor's 200 columns: a reliable datasheet on this particular point.
RANGE UP TO 1200°C AS AN OPTION ON A HANDHELD STANDALONE DEVICE, a feature generally reserved for high-end professional devices already documented (FLIR E96, HIKMICRO SP60H), but here on a much more modest 200 × 150 sensor.
The highest (so least sensitive) NETD of the entire Extech range in this comparison. 100 mK, versus 70 mK for the IRC130, despite a higher-resolution sensor — confirming that better spatial resolution does not necessarily come with better thermal sensitivity, a trade-off already documented in our article on NETD versus IFOV.